Monday 25 February 2013

Sound of the Underground



You might think that Beyoncé’s Sasha Fierce or Tyra Bank’s feisty callouts are an extension of their strong personalities. You’ll be surprised to learn that New York’s underground, drag-based Ballroom or ‘Ball’ subculture is the real inspiration. Balls see GLBT New Yorkers strut their stuff in elaborately-crafted stage shows that mix drag, couture and dance. Participants hope to win trophies and secure praise for their ‘realness’. Since the 80s, the styles, sounds and symbols born from Balls have been referenced by a plethora of musicians and performers – with little tangible benefit to the community itself.

Balls play host to a type of dancing queen worlds away from ABBA. African American and Hispanic members of New York’s GLBT community have dominated Ball for decades. The community is characterised by external prejudice and internal struggle, with members often involved in sex work, drugs and alcohol abuse, and subjected to hatred and bigotry. Some have been abandoned by their families due to their sexual orientation whilst others have endured poverty or mistreatment at home.

Participants in Ball find shelter in ‘houses’, which are sub-groups led by a senior Ball individual. With evocative names like Xtravaganza, LaBeija and Legacy International, these houses nurture and develop talented youngsters (‘Ball children’) to become legends of the scene. They also serve as surrogate families, providing the acceptance and support that participants’ relations often fail to provide. Ball culture provides community members an opportunity to forget their daily financial and social struggles, emulating the wealth and ease they see in society’s elites but have little hope of attaining themselves.
 
Ironically, a segment of those elites – namely celebrities - have gained prosperity by taking influence from Ball culture. Madonna, Beyoncé, Scissor Sisters and Azealia Banks have all appropriated aspects of Ball in their music and performances, including stage outfits, poses and lyrics. While the music industry generates revenue from its appropriations of Ballroom culture, the collective rarely enjoys the spoils of its labour.
There are not only financial implications, but cultural ones too. Ball veteran Lee Soulja and Father of the House of Khan Luna Khan believe that when the sub-culture is appropriated by the mainstream, “a lot of people still don’t know where it came [sic] from”. The Ball community strongly believes that society should be aware of when Ball culture is being referenced, and what it actually entails: poverty and fantasy in equal measure.

Acknowledgement is a tenuous issue. Beyoncé has professed to take inspiration for her alter ego Sasha Fierce from the cutthroat performance style of New York drag queens. She has described Fierce as “the more aggressive, more glamorous side that comes out when I'm on the stage”.  Like Ball participants, Beyoncé uses the persona to project an exaggerated image separate from reality. Knowles is everything that members of the Ball community wish to be – rich, powerful and celebrated. However, her name-checking of Ball culture has not transferred any of those attributes onto the community.

Despite the high-profile nature of Ball culture knock-offs, actual members of the group rarely shake their low socio-economic status or anonymity. Occasionally, individuals break into the spotlight.  Madonna’s 1990 single ‘Vogue’ took its name and synonymous head-framing dance from the Ball circuit. Madge briefly provided some fame and financial advantage for two Ballroom dancers she recruited for the song’s promotion. Azealia Banks employed similar methods with her track ‘Fierce’, inviting a husky New York drag queen to recall his memories of 1980s Balls over a percussive house beat.

But even these concessions are relatively basic. They are concerned with glamour and luxury, rather than the daily life or identity of Ball participants. Members of the community (or ‘Ball children’) celebrate their sexuality, physicality and race to a supportive – albeit limited – audience at Balls. Many wish for fame so as to further broadcast their sexual identities, and improve their quality of life.

Some argue that popular appropriations of Ball culture achieve the former goal, promoting GLBT culture positively to large audiences. Others, however, believe that the actions of Madonna et al are tantamount to pillaging.

It is also thought that by melding Ball culture to fit the demands of popular audiences, artists patronise the collective. They present a one-dimensional, simplistic version of a group that is as tragic as it is joyful, relying on aspects of the culture that are easily digestible.

One avenue of this superficial referencing is the bespoke terminology that has gradually emerged from the Ball circuit. Phrases like “throwing shade” and “spilling tea” codify Ball culture, and distinguish it from broader society. They also provide a selling point for pop songs, setting a track apart from its chart competitors through wacky lyrics that convey nonsense and fun.

A case in point is the Scissor Sisters’ ‘Let’s Have A Kiki’. The track’s title arouses curiosity, while its prim-and-proper rap verses are matched with a bizarre range of Ball culture phrases. Soulja and Khan claim that the track has left much of the Ball community feeling “like they are being ripped off”. “It’s cute that they are using Ballroom language, but why can’t they just simply add in a reference to its origin?” they ask.

New Yorker and dance music performer Cherie Lily recognises the importance of crediting the Ball circuit. Her high-energy song ‘WERK’, which she describes as “a tribute to the scene”, draws heavily on Ball vocab: “gimme face”, “realness”, and “a legend never dies” stutter over a pulsating electro beat throughout. New York nightlife personalities appear in the ‘WERK’ video, making clear the influence that Ball culture has had on Lily’s music. “Without them, I wouldn't have been able to express the vibe,” she says.

Even when Ball culture is acknowledged (in the cases of Beyoncé and Cherie Lily, for example), broader understanding of the community’s experience is usually limited at best. The financial difficulties, drug abuse, prostitution, familial rejection and violence that have characterised the community’s underbelly are hidden beneath an exterior of flamboyance and exhibitionism. This surface is never scratched through by entertainment industry heavyweights.

A token reference is better than nothing, however. According to DJ Johnny Dynell, Madonna was (and is) seen by Ball particpants “as a thief who was exploiting them and making money from their scene”, without verbally paying credit to it.

Similar issues are at play closer to home. Aboriginal hip hop is not a high-profile genre for commercial radio listeners or chart devotees. Its influence on broader Australia hip hop, though, is considerable – and rarely acknowledged.

Sydney-based rapper Munkimuk is renowned by his peers as the godfather of Aboriginal hip-hop. He believes that Australia’s flourishing hip hop circuit owes much of its success to the work of underappreciated and uncredited forbears. Recalling the scene’s early incarnations, Munkimuk describes “this little thing that only these sorts of races [Aboriginal, Islander and Lebanese] were into” – a means of conveying personal experience, often closely tied to ethnicity and subjugation.

A run-through of the today’s best-known Australian hip hop artists - Hilltop Hoods, 360, Drapht and Bliss N Eso - reveals a markedly different ethnic make-up. An anthology called The Best of Aussie Hip Hop released last year focuses on the genre’s recent commercial successes. Aboriginal hip hop is notable in its absence from the tracklisting, given the sway Aboriginal artists have held. Such omissions will only widen the existing fissure between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal artists in terms of financial and cultural recognition.

For years the Australian accent was commercially detrimental for hip hop. According to Munkimuk, using one’s actual accent rather than a faux-American twang “was looked upon by mainstream music listeners as weird”. He believes that Aboriginal hip hop helped local acts become comfortable performing with their natural enunciation, ultimately producing a more distinctive national flavour.

The influence of Aboriginal culture doesn’t end there. Wire MC’s track ‘It’s A Modern Day Corroboree’ infers a link between hip hop and traditional indigenous oral story-telling. Perhaps the narrative style that now underpins local hip hop owes its roots, to some extent, to this initial adaptation by the Aboriginal hip hop community.

Although non-indigenous hip hop acts currently rule the commercial roost, Munkimuk thinks that Aboriginal rappers remain a source of uncredited inspiration. “Aussie hip-hop artists are right onto the indigenous scene,” he says. The stories of Aboriginal rapper are still being told, but seldom on a commercial stage.
To an extent, the commonalities between Aboriginal and non-indigenous hip hop can be attributed to the nature of the genre. Rap is, at its core, about overcoming adversity. The difficulty here, then, is that indigenous struggles aren’t being given the same voice as others.

Likewise, Ball culture and pop music hold intrinsic commonalities. Both are based around the desire to forget one’s circumstances in favour of another world of glamour, energy and happiness. More than any other factor, the transformative, escapist nature of pop helps explain why Azealia Banks raps about the glitz of Ball culture, rather than the prostitution and drug abuse that it’s so closely linked to.

Some members of the Ballroom collective are happy to accept their lot, content in the knowledge that they have inspired popular movements. According to Johnny Dynell, the process of mainstream adaptation follows a familiar pattern. “Some people will make money from it, some will become famous but most will just fade away. It's cultural Darwinism,” he says.

Others will continue to fight for recognition, keen for the world to understand the source of its entertainment and the turmoil and trauma key to its development. The desires of this party are epitomised in the 1988 film Paris Is Burning, which exposes the shiny facade of Ballroom competitions and the frequently sad circumstances that give rise to them. Drag queen Dorian Corey summarises the community’s position – past and present – when he says that “everybody wants to make an impression, some mark upon the world”.

Thursday 11 October 2012

Frank Ocean - Channel Orange (review)




This review was published in the seventh 2012 edition of BULL magazine.

You might not have heard of Frank Orange, but he’s already worked with the crème de la crème of the American music industry: Beyonce, John Legend, Jay-Z, Kanye West…and Justin Bieber. Now, on his debut album, Ocean exhibits a musical breadth rare on a first innings.

It’s tempting to pigeon hole Ocean into the R&B box, but Channel Orange feels more diverse than this tag would suggest. The breezy ‘Sweet Life’ lands somewhere between latter-day Kanye West and Amy Winehouse’s early, care-free moments, and ‘Thinkin Bout You’ is reminiscent of the subtle sensuality of Ocean’s work on Beyonce’s last album. ‘Pyramids’ is difficult to pin down in one sentence – suffice to say it clocks in at ten minutes and makes for truly fascinating listeningWhether intentional or not, a thread that binds the album’s diverse sounds is the employment of uncommon, even confusing structures. The sparseness of the production on many tracks is equally refreshing. Another mark of consistency is Ocean’s evocative voice; his upper register particularly is evocative of Stevie Wonder.

Amidst this mélange of influences and sounds, one factor detracts from the whole. Four interludes, each clocking in at well under 90 seconds, help flesh things out, but add little to the musical side of things.

4 Stars

Intellipop



A tragically shortened version of this piece was published in BULL's seventh edition for 2012.

The year is 2002. You’re at your primary school’s bi-annual disco. The ageing hall is lit half-heartedly by glow sticks and a dusty disco ball, and you’ve just finished dancing ironically to The Ketchup Song. You can’t wait to get out of this dump.

As you roll your eyes and reach for your cup of watery yellow cordial, something changes. The terrible soundtrack you’ve been putting up with all night is suspended for 30 seconds or so by an intriguing melodic line backed by stabs of piano and a downbeat baritone sax. It feels slower, and the beat is different.

You come to a sudden realisation. It’s a bloody time signature change. In a pop song. This isn’t ‘Stairway To Heaven’. It’s ‘Round Round’ by the Sugababes. And it is brilliant.

You might not have experienced a eureka moment quite like this. In any case, such instances – relatively few and far between, admittedly –exemplify the revelatory nature of pop music that pushes boundaries. We might call it ‘intellipop’. A genre that manages to combine the un-combinable: the spark and catchiness of pop music, and the structural variation and credibility of more alternative genres.

‘Intellipop’ is often found in the least expected of places. Below a glossy surface may lie a surprisingly innovative musical makeup. Of course, certain popstars shove their intellect down the listener’s throat with metaphor and social commentary and allusion and imagery and concept, but the most exhilarating ‘intelli-pop’ tends to stem not from self-crafted ingénues, but rather manufactured acts and the sonic scientists who fiddle with mixing desk knobs.

‘Round Round’ – which was a solid Top Twenty single here, and a Number One in the UK – is an example of the conscious breaking of every rule upon which the standard pop song is based. The song was written and produced by British outfit Xenomania, and received praise by rock-centric music publication NME for its “whip-smart rhythms” and indie-esque “if-we-could-be-arsed drawl”. Xenomania’s name more-or-less refers to an intense obsession with everything foreign, and sums up their attitude to pop.

As well as a handful of hits for the Sugababes, the production house can also be credited with the odds-defying career of Girls Aloud. Formed on a reality TV show almost a decade ago, Girls Aloud could so easily have gone the way of Bardot or Scandal’us (we will not forget). However, steered by Xenomania they became the most successful girl-group in UK chart history, scoring twenty consecutive Top Ten hits before taking a hiatus to launch largely-disappointing solo careers.

The success of Girls Aloud is even more bizarre given their music. It’s pop in essence, and proudly so, but plays with all the structures and lyrical themes we expect from a pop song.  Their last Number One, ‘The Promise’, packs seven melodic cells – more than double the standard three - into less than four minutes. One of their other signature singles, ‘Biology’, is as baffling as it is catchy. There’s a chorus, but it’s the last of five melodies to be introduced. Sonically, it could be described as the musical equivalent of a futuristic Grace Kelly falling elegantly from a rickety apple cart into the muscled arms of a country bumpkin from the deep south of America.
"How dare they claim Skrillex brought dubstep to the masses!"

Of course, British eccentricity, while all well and good, does not a veritable musical phenomenon make. Intelli-pop has also seen fits and bursts of activity in the US. During her most hedonistic, crazy days, Britney Spears got in on the act of producing stupefying, innovative pop. On 2007’s Blackout –on which she’s listed as an Executive Producer, unlike her other albums – Spears flirted with dubstep five years before ‘Bangarang’. The sinister, dark sounds that dominate the album paved the way for the rise of Lady Gaga, and caused the album to be named “the most influential pop album of the past five years” by Rolling Stone. Turn up your noses though you may at the mere mention of Britney, Blackout was described by the indie-loving, pop-loathing Pitchfork as “envelope-pushing…disorientating and thrilling”, and inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

Of course, all this raises the question of how these rather bombastic, abnormal pieces of music manage to sit prettily in the Top 10. I know what you’re thinking: “the public will buy anything if it’s marketed well”. Perhaps this is true. Flashes of flesh, tabloid tidbits, multiple costumes changes and dance routines executed with varying degrees of accuracy probably play some role in masking innovation in familiarity.

This assumption might underestimate the discerning power of the public, though. Is it not possible that the masses, as well as the popstars themselves, are in on the joke? 

We’re constantly told that the music written and played by its ‘face’ is superior to digitised, outsourced alternatives. We could attribute the success of ‘intellipop’ with the brief suspension of these assumptions. The most exciting purveyors of the genre play on pop stereotypes – the manufactured girl-group and the ditzy pop-puppet, for example. They embody them wryly and knowingly, with a literal and/or metaphorical wink-and-nudge routine, and incredibly refreshing results.

Those that lose out, then, are those who cling to notions of traditional credibility, and fail to look past what is admittedly a glamorous and aesthetically pleasing surface.